Day 2, April 15 - Posters
Is it fair to use false evidence ploys with juvenile suspects when they have autism or an intellectual disability?
Start Date
15-4-2020 1:00 PM
End Date
15-4-2020 3:00 PM
Publisher
University of Tennessee at Chattanooga
Place of Publication
Chattanooga (Tenn.)
Abstract
We assessed the effects explicit and implicit police interrogation tactics on the perceived credibility of juvenile suspects. False evidence ploys were viewed most unfair when suspects had autism or intellectual disability.
Date
4-15-2020
Document Type
posters
Language
English
Rights
http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/
Recommended Citation
Bettens, Talley; Greenlee, Leanza; Perry, Delaney; Warren, Amye; Divincenzo, Claudia; Hill, Kaitlyn; and Hill, Joanna, "Is it fair to use false evidence ploys with juvenile suspects when they have autism or an intellectual disability?". ReSEARCH Dialogues Conference proceedings. https://scholar.utc.edu/research-dialogues/2020/day2_posters/56.
Is it fair to use false evidence ploys with juvenile suspects when they have autism or an intellectual disability?
We assessed the effects explicit and implicit police interrogation tactics on the perceived credibility of juvenile suspects. False evidence ploys were viewed most unfair when suspects had autism or intellectual disability.